GRE写作中如何判断题目中的事实和观点?作文审题技巧深度精析，快来看看吧,下面小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。
GRE写作中如何判断题目中的事实和观点?作文审题技巧深度精析
GRE写作审题需学会判断事实和观点
在GRE写作部分的两道题目中，ISSUE题需要考生自己归纳并给出观点，之后围绕这个观点进行展开论述。这道题目的要求一般来说是比较清晰明确的。而ARGUMENT则会给出一段文字内容较长的文本材料，考生需要先自己读完这段内容，再从中找出各种逻辑错误问题，并自己组织出一篇反驳素材各种逻辑漏洞的驳论文。这对于考生的审题要求就比较高了，很多同学面对ARGUMENT题目，都存在找不到逻辑漏洞，或是找到的逻辑漏洞并不重要只是微小错误，而一些主要的逻辑错误却抓不住的情况，这样写出来的ARGUMENT驳论文自然缺乏力度拿不到高分。而为了提升大家的审题精准度，学会判断题目素材中的事实和观点就变得很重要了。
学会判断事实和观点对写作审题有什么帮助?
那么说到学会判断事实和观点对写作审题的具体帮助，其实主要还是集中在ARGUMENT部分，可以帮助考生分清题目中哪些部分可能存在逻辑漏洞，而哪些地方并没有太多值得质疑的地方。简单来说，如果是事实，那么这些内容就是客观存在，不存在争议的，这样的内容自然不会有逻辑漏洞。而如果是观点，那就是带有一定主观色彩，考生无法确定是否为真，可以被争论的内容，这些内容中一般都会有可以反驳的余地。
实例讲解GRE写作题目中的事实和观点
那么在GRE作文的题目中，哪些部分是事实哪些是观点呢?下面我们通过一道ETS官方题库中的ARGUMENT作文题目来为大家做具体解读：
The vice president for human resources at Climpson Industries sent the following recommendation to the company's president.
"In an effort to improve our employees' productivity, we should implement electronic monitoring of employees' Internet use from their workstations. Employees who use the Internet inappropriately from their workstations need to be identified and punished if we are to reduce the number of work hours spent on personal or recreational activities, such as shopping or playing games. Installing software on company computers to detect employees' Internet use is the best way to prevent employees from wasting time on the job. It will foster a better work ethic at Climpson and improve our overall profits."
这道题目讲的是某公司人力资源部门副主席发出的一份建议信，在这段题目素材中，属于事实的部分是：
1. 发建议信要求添加对员工网络的监控
2. 员工在工作时间使用网络购物或玩游戏
属于观点的部分是：
1. 监控员工网络情况有助提升生产力
2. 在工作时间不正当使用网络的员工应该被惩处
3. 监控网络是防止员工划水最好的方法
4. 这么做可以培养工作道德提升公司整体利益
通过这样对题目内容中事实和观点的整理，相信大家就能看出来，这段材料中哪些地方存在更多更明显的逻辑漏洞了，显然都是观点部分。因为事实部分本身没有什么可以反驳的地方，都是客观发生的事情。而观点中则基本上都是这位副主席自己主观臆断的看法思想。同时观点部分中逻辑漏洞最大的地方也很明显，那就是第三条“监控网络是防止员工划水最好的方法”了，因为直接使用了最高级，所以这个观点太过武断绝对，也是最值得反驳的。然后提升生产力、培养工作道德等等观点也有不少值得反驳的地方，这样就可以很轻松地找到几个主要的逻辑漏洞。而一旦大家整理清楚了题目的逻辑问题，之后文章改怎么写自然也就一目了然了。
综上所述，学会快速准确地分辨事实和观点，对于GRE写作ARGUMENT的审题是非常有帮助的。缺乏驳论文写作思路和逻辑思维分析能力的同学，可以参考学习一下本文的方法，相信对大家理顺和提升逻辑思维会很有帮助。
新gre考试作文新题库解析issue
Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.
Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.
结论：政府需要给社会主要城市提供财政支持，来保证其繁荣发展。
原因：一个国家的文化传统主要是在城市中得以传承和发展。
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
讨论你在多大程度上同意或者不同意题中的论断以及论断所依据的理由。
新gre考试作文新题库解析issue
A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
在进行大学教育以前，国家应该要求所有的学生学习统一的国家课程。
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
讨论你在多大程度上同意或者不同意题中的建议并解释你持有这一立场的理由。在发展和支持你的立场时，请描述一些具体的情形，此时采纳该建议会具有优势/劣势，并解释这些例子(你所列举的情形)是如何塑造了你当前持有的立场的。
新GRE写作：闪光灯下的名誉
题目：
"The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished."
"被置于媒体审视下的任何人，其名誉终将受毁损。"
范文：
The intensity of today's media coverage has been greatly magnified by the sheer number and types of media outlets that are available today. Intense competition for the most revealing photographs and the latest information on a subject has turned even minor media events into so-called "media frenzies". Reporters are forced by the nature of the competition to pry ever deeper for an angle on a story that no one else has been able to uncover. With this type of media coverage, it does become more and more likely that anyone who is subjected to it will have his or her reputation tarnished, as no individual is perfect. Everyone makes mistakes. The advances in technology have made much information easily and instantaneously available. Technology has also made it easier to dig further than ever before into a person's past, increasing the possibility that the subject's reputation may be harmed.
The above statement is much too broad, however. "Anyone" covers all people all over the world. There are people whose reputations have only been enhanced by media scrutiny. There are also people whose reputations were already so poor that media scrutiny could not possibly diminish it any further. There may very well be people that have done nothing wrong in the past, at least that can be discovered by the media, whose reputations could not be diminished by media scrutiny. To broadly state that "anyone" subjected to media coverage will have his or her status sullied implies that everyone's reputation worldwide is susceptible to damage under any type of media scrutiny. What about children, particularly newborn children? What about those people whose past is entirely unknown?
Another problem with such a broad statement is that it does not define the particular level of media scrutiny. Certainly there are different levels of media coverage. Does merely the mention of one's name in a newspaper constitute media scrutiny? What about the coverage of a single event in someone's life, for example a wedding or the birth of a baby? Is the media coverage of the heroic death of a firefighter or police officer in the line of duty ever going to diminish that person's reputation? It seems highly unlikely that in these examples, although these people may have been subjected to media scrutiny, these individual's reputations are undamaged and potentially enhanced by such exposure.
[范文正文]
当今媒体报道的力度，由于当今时代所能获得的媒体渠道那前所未有的数量和种类，从而被极大地增强。围绕着对最具暴露性的图片及对某一题材最新信息所展开的竞争，使哪怕是次要的媒体事件也转变为所谓的"媒体疯狂".由于竞争的本质，记者们被迫就某一项报道作深度采访，以其窥探到一个任何其他人都无法揭示的视角。随着这类媒体报道的出现，任何被置于媒体报道之下的人，其名誉越来越有可能被玷污，因为"金无赤金，人无完人".每个人都有可能犯错误。技术进步使大量的信息在第一瞬间便被轻易获取。技术也使媒体得以比以往任何时候更深入地去挖掘一个人的过去，从而更增加了当事人名誉受损的可能性。
然则，上述陈述涵盖面过于宽泛。"任何人"涵盖了世界上所有的人。有些人的名誉反而会因为媒体的聚焦而陡然显赫起来。也有些人，其名声早就如此之糟糕，以致于媒体的聚焦再也无法让它受到更坏的毁损。笼统地陈述受媒体报道的"任何人"均会使其地位被玷污，这暗示着全球每个人的名声在任何种类的媒体聚焦下均易于遭诟病。那么，对于天真无辜的孩子们，尤其新生婴儿，情况会如何?对于那些其过去根本无人知晓的人来说，情况又会是什么样呢?
对于这样一项笼统的陈述而言，它的另一个问题是没能明晰界定媒体聚焦的具体程度。媒体的报道毫无疑问存在程度上的差别。只在报纸上提及一个人的名字，是否算作媒体聚焦?对某人一生中单独一次事件(如婚礼或孩子出生)的报道这也算媒介聚焦吗?媒体对消防队员或警官因公而死的英雄壮举进行报道，难道也会毁损该人的名声吗?在这些实例中，其名声受损的事情极不可能发生。虽然这些人可能被置于媒体审视之下，但其名声却会完好无损，且潜在地可因这些披露而得以提高。
GRE写作中如何判断题目中的事实和观点相关文章：
