GRE写作怎样保证原创度?实用方法技巧解读，下面小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。
GRE写作怎样保证原创度?实用方法技巧解读
1.GRE作文观点要有洞察力和原创特色
观点是GRE作文考试的核心内容，考察考生能否对一个issue进行深入分析与思考并最终提出一个有层次的观点。有了原创观点就不用担心雷同。我这样说也许有有点像让快饿死的人去吃肉粥。如果真的要借鉴范文观点，我建议应该尽可能做一些调整，以避免第二个雷区。或者干脆在文中讲明这个思路是借鉴了哪一本参考书的。美国人对真小人比对伪君子要宽容。
2.GRE写作照抄原文是禁止事项
在语言上可以使用一些范文的句式，但是绝对不能照抄原文，而是要换掉一些关键词。或者如果要借用关键词，则必须使用别的句式。
3.文章结构可以进行借鉴和专用
比如把北美范文用在120题的结构和破题策略用在210题上。
4.范文中的例句仍然可以引用
在例证方面，使用范文用过的例证没有问题，哪怕用那些被判雷同的例证也没问题。例证是人类的共同知识，谁都可以使用，关键是我们不能用和范文作者同样的思路和语言来诠释例证并展开类似的论证。
因此，越是耳熟能详的例证如牛顿与苹果树、爱迪生孵蛋，要写出原创的内容就越困难，雷同的危险就越大。
综上，要想根本避免GRE作文雷同情况发生，我们一方面可以在政策允许的范围内对范文进行合法、合理的使用，另一方面更要积极培养我们自己的独立思考能力，从根本上解决雷同问题，避免因雷同而被取消成绩。 这就需要考生有自己的思想、自己的例证和自己的语言，各位考生尽量不要照抄范文，而是自己来写。
让你的GRE写作独一无二
首先你要做的是，避免临阵磨枪。如果到GRE考试在即，再去学习GRE写作范文，这样做虽然会使你创作的框架上与范文相似，但仅仅是做到了形似而神不似。这样的写作紧紧停留在临摹而不是创作阶段，这样创作的文章只是表面唬人，但实际只是“纸老虎”，没有自己的中心思想，也抓不住题目的意义以及对考题透彻的分析。所以，应该在学习模板的同时创造出属于自己的写作模板。
其次你要做到提高自己的词汇量。不同的英语词汇有时会表达相同的意思，但是在文章中起的作用大不相同，一篇文章中你使用的是否是高阶词汇，是不是句型多变都决定了你作文的得分。你创作文章使用的词汇不一定要多华丽，重在变幻，读你的作文要像坐过山车，柳暗花明又一村。
最后善用模板，不断练习。模板的使用，可以使你在GRE作文考试中，迅速了解考题，并且根据自己的模板，构建自己的作文结构，但是这种结构并不是适用于任何文章。这是需要你去合理调配。有了作文的结构，仅仅只是框架，你需要填充自己的灵魂，即自己的中心思想，而中心思想是靠自己不断的总结，各种知识在你脑海的沉淀，只有有阅历的人才可以写出内涵丰富的文章。
新GRE考试issue写作范文：权威问题
新GRE考试issue写作范文：权威问题
Much of the information that people assume is‘factual’actually turns out to be inaccurate. Thus，any piece of information referred to as a‘fact’should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future.
大多数人们认为是事实的信息结果实际上都是不准确的。因此，任何据称是事实的信息都应该被质疑，因为它在将来很可能会被证明为是错误的。中华考试网(www.Examw。com)
GRE写作范文：
Should we be doubtful to all the information at hands because the rightness of which is uncertain? The speaker claims so，I concede that people often commit various fallacies in the course of cognizing things，however I fundamentally take exception of the arguer's assertion to mistrust every fact we might encounter. And I will substantially discuss my views thereinafter.
To begin with，the speaker seems to implicate that a fact would be proven false in the future under numerous circumstance. Nevertheless I prefer to arguer that facts never change. No matter how did the Medieval Church and Inquisition persecute Bruno，the fact never changes that the earth is far from being the center of the universe as the religious sovereigns had assumed or hoped for，while just a minor particle in it. Equally，no matter how Edison had tried to incite the public fear and distrust to the alternative current electricity，the fact never changes that Teals’ electrical system is vastly superior to his direct current electrical one，and would be accepted and applied in larger range.
However，what do change are the human's objective interpretations to facts. One compelling argument to this point is that，due to the limitation of human’s knowledge and comprehensive capability，they tend to make insufficient or even false understanding to the certain fact. An apt illustration is the changes of cognition to disease. While at the ancient time，our progenitors believed the a man becoming a patient for the reason that he had conduct crimes or offended some ghosts or spirits，the contemporary people have well know that the varies of pathogens are the basic causes to our diseases，and the defects of our immune system and so forth are also the factors as well. Another argument for the change of comprehension to fact is that different people always observe and interpret from different perspectives. Though the Relativity theory is not well compliable with the Quantum mechanism，no one call the greatness of both Einstein and Bohr，because their theories are based on distinct views，the former from the macrocosm and the later from the microcosm.
Notwithstanding the foregoing reasons for that human tend to make fallacies during the cause of comprehending and cognizing facts，these reasons should never be the excuses to doubt every conclusion we might draw from facts. Based on certain rational inference and proper knowledge fundament，the conclusions we make might well be justifiable，if not completely right，to certain degree. What we need to do is to promote the enterprise of pursuing the better answer and try to use the result we have get to application，instead of wasting our time to undue doubt and suspicion. Though the medical scientists have not fully understood the mechanism of how the does the implanted organ interact with the wounded body，they are not refrain from using the implanting skill to save patients，of course the precondition or which is that this technology is much well established than the fundamental theory.
To sum up，while I advocate the speaker's opinion that it is inevitable for human to comprehend facts inaccurately，for the reason of the limitation of the abilities，I essentially disagree with his assertion that facts will continually alter themselves，as well as his recommendation to discredit any piece of fact. In the final analysis，I would arguer once more that facts never change and although the misunderstanding to them is inevitable，we should not defer ourselves from the pursuit to fully comprehending them.
GRE写作怎样保证原创度相关文章：
