新GRE作文水平提高是一个漫长的过程，只有脚踏实地的准备才能逐渐提升，不是靠短期冲刺突击就会迅速起效，所以掌握一些GRE作文模板，对于逐渐提高GRE考试分数会有一定帮助。下面小编就和大家分享GRE写作用模板如何避免雷同又能提分,希望能够帮助到大家，来欣赏一下吧。
GRE写作用模板如何避免雷同又能提分?
新GRE写作模板使用策略1
拿到新GRE作文的模板以后，要做的第一件事情就是确定文章的主体框架结构，第一时间定位引出观点和总结观点的词汇以及句式，从而确定这篇写作模板的水平，进一步评估其参考使用价值。
新GRE写作模板使用策略2
新GRE写作模板要看的最主要的地方就是它的论证结构，需要做到能够确定论证过程的框架，比如对一篇模板的每个支持段落都有各自的论证模式，举例，因果，对比等方面的分解学习，最好能精确到对于确定到论证的逻辑引导词上。
新GRE写作模板使用策略3
确认主框架结构和论证结构，评估出对于这篇模板的使用方式后，就可以开始通过改写文章模板的句子，运用自己擅长的表达方式，句型和词汇等内容对结构框架进行替换变更，将这篇模板改造成自己习惯的模样。
新GRE写作模板使用策略4
整体改变完成后，可以对句式做一下小调整和改变，将各类语法结构加入其中，比如：倒装，独立主格结构，虚拟语气等。当然这个步骤属于锦上添花，而不是画蛇添足，所以每位考生都请根据自己的实际情况量力而行。
新GRE写作模板使用策略5
对于模板当中各段的论证方式，请按照<提出分论点><解释分论点><总结分论点/联系主观点>的方式进行整理和调整，并在每个分段的最后总结一下分论点和主观点之间的联系，保证整体论证的完整合理和逻辑通顺。
新GRE写作模板使用策略6
改写句子过程中需要特别注意不同句式的变换，尽量避免简单句的并列使用，多写一些高质量的句式，为文章增光添彩。
新GRE写作模板使用策略7
尽量减少零碎的句子，多使用比如which、where等连词把句子串联起来。
GRE作文范文：审查的公正性
Censorship is rarely, if ever, justified.
GRE作文范文参考：
“Censorship” is a word which seems to be authoritative rather than democratic, which implies the will of the governors rather than the will of general people. Since the occurrence of the censorship, which could be traced back to the Ancient Rome, it has been playing an important part in the domestic affairs while arousing applause and condemnation as well. Here the our government faces a dilemma, is it fair to carry on the censorship at the cost of sacrificing part of democracy, or just open the gate letting flows of ideas and thoughts in, at the risk of losing its own rampart.
Since censorship suggest an act of changing or suppressing speech, writing or any other forms of expression that is condemned as subversive of the common good, it must have a close relationship with the one who applies such supervision, and the word “common good” should be redefined under different conditions. There is time when we were all under a powerful monarchy, and the “common good” is the “monarch good”, then the censorship itself is the instrument of the monarch which solely depended on the will of the monarch; in the Middle Ages, both the Roman Catholic and the Protestant Churches practiced censorship that seemed to be oppressive to any ideas challenging the doctrines of churches and the existence of God; even now, in some authoritative countries, the censorship is used to rule its people by restricting their minds, of course, for the stability of their governing over the people. With these regards, censorship itself is questioned at the rationality of existing, regardless of the practices made by the democratic government, while the justice of the democratic government is quite doubtable.
The matter concerning is not only who practices the censorship but also how it is practiced. Since different men make different comments on the same work of art, for example, it is hard to set up a measure by which we could decide whether one should be prohibited, especially to the work of arts, as its content always labeled as “subversive” and “revolutionary”, two words detested by the governors most. Such cases could be found in Ulysses by J. Joyce and Lady Chatterley’s Lover by D.H Lawrence, these two great novels were firstly considered to be guilty of obscenity and were put to prohibition by the American government, but turned out to be true masterpieces today. So any form of censorship, to some extent, lags behind the development of ideas and will put more or less a negative effect on their development.
Though the censorship is such a disgusting word embodying so much oppression and might, it is a compromise we made with the reality far from being perfect, to provide a comparative stable ground which we could stand on. At this point, I don’t agree with the institute like ACLU who oppose any censorship. The censorship, though rarely justified, should exist as long as a more ideal and practical form is found to replace it, or we could only expe
GRE作文范文：想法付诸行动的困难
Practicality is now our great idol, which all powers and talents must serve.Anything that is not obviously practical has little value in today's world.
GRE作文范文参考：
In today’s society idealism seems to become an ideology that is marginalized and practicality is our great idol, thus, the speaker asserts that anything that is not practical bears little value. I admit that being practical is the wide-accepted dogma in order to survive in this world, but by going too far to claim that anything that is not practical has little value is against the empirical observation as well as the general stimulus that push the human society forward.
Admittedly, practicality has become a cult in today’s society. Too often do we hear people talk about being practical whenever they come to make important decisions or choose between several alternatives. The deep-rooted cause underlying this phenomenon is that with the development of modern society, the emphasis is placed more on financial gaining, quick fame, sensible choice and so forth. Our society is rather stable compared with that of the last century when war, violence, human right movements has become the symbol of that period. People are enjoying this peaceful environment with less crucial missions rested upon them and as a result, they shift from idealism to struggle for the common well being of mankind to the practical concept of individual achievement.
This ideology has its merits since after all the disaster and upheaval that our human race has undergone, it is judicious to focus on the economic aspect of things in order to tackle the most important social problems such as poverty, hunger and environmental problems which all deserve us to sit down and work out practical solutions. On the personal level, being practical is how a person would possibly succeed in his career or personal life. One is likely to make sensible decisions for his education and job choice on the basis of practical consideration of his own strength and weakness and careful analysis of the prospect of research direction and job market. Even those in power and intellects need to consider practically since hasty decision built upon pure ideal meditation would hardly find its way in the modern society and is doom to failure.
Agreeing with the speaker that practicality has become the great idol in our society, I am strongly against his point that anything that is not practical has little value. Even in today’s society, idealism is by no means relegated to the place of total neglect and disregard. For one thing, in history, so much achievement is the outcome of several generations’ struggle such as fighting for equality for women, human rights movement,etc. In today’s society, practicality is the way we can obtain our goal but idealism offers the philosophical explanation of why we should set this as our goal and the clear the ultimate value of our pursuing. What is more, by totally fixed one's eyes upon the practical aspect of things, we face the danger of neglecting one important part of our pursuit, that is the mental enjoyment brought out by idealism. If we have a clear goal set in mind and put practical endeavor at the same time, the result would be more satisfactory and valuable.
To sum up, I agree with the speaker insofar as the wide acceptance of practicality is considered. Being practical is the tenet of modern society and it does shed light on the wise way of doing things and obtaining goals, no matter in the personal or social level.But the speaker goes too far by claiming that it is the only valuable ideology in society.I am strongly against this idea since in history or at present, we human beings still need the philosophical explanation to clear our goal and to provide motivation. In this aspect, idealism would never be replaced with pure practical consideration. Otherwise,human society will be replete with insensible people directed by economic profit and quick fame and recognition.
GRE写作相关文章：
★ GRE写作:高分技巧
★ GRE写作:怎样缓解紧张
★ GRE写作:写作论据的技巧
★ GRE写作:高分冲刺
★ GRE写作:高分技巧
